Alternatives
Comparing AI scribes for private clinics
Each comparison sticks to what the other vendor publishes on its own website, with links and the date we read it (4 November 2026). Here is what Docdemic leads with.
Hosted in the EU, no OpenAI
Clinical content is stored in EU data centres and Docdemic does not send it to OpenAI. Customer content is not used to train models.
Templates for your specialty
Template packs for therapy (DAP, BIRP, intake, treatment plan), physiotherapy, dermatology, dentistry, aesthetics, chiropractic and veterinary practice, and you can build your own.
Between-visit check-ins
Patients answer the questions you choose on their phone between visits, and a summary is ready when you write the next note.
Research add-on
The same workspace handles literature search, interview transcription and statistics for clinicians who also do research.
Comparisons
Docdemic vs Heidi Health
Clinicians broadly, from GPs and specialists to allied health, dentists and vets; founded in Melbourne, Australia.
Docdemic vs Freed
Independent clinicians in the US across 20+ specialties.
Docdemic vs Tandem Health
European clinicians across many specialties; Tandem Health AB is based in Stockholm.
Docdemic vs Nabla
Primarily health systems and enterprises, plus individual clinicians and API partners.
Docdemic vs Tortus
NHS Trusts and NHS GP practices in the UK.
Docdemic vs Lyrebird Health
Primarily Australian GPs and GP clinics, plus specialists and allied health.
Docdemic vs Scribeberry
Canadian clinicians across specialties.
Docdemic vs Mentalyc
Mental health therapists, solo and group practices.
Docdemic vs Upheal
Therapists and mental health practices; also offers its own EHR.
Product names are trademarks of their owners and are used only to identify the products compared. Docdemic is not affiliated with any of them.